Which method is commonly used to resolve disputes in the legal system?

Negotiation is frequently used as a method to resolve disputes in the legal system because it allows the parties involved to directly communicate and work toward a mutually agreeable solution. This method emphasizes collaboration and compromise without the need for a third party to dictate the outcome, thereby fostering a more amicable resolution.

Negotiation can take place at various stages of a legal process, from pre-litigation discussions to post-trial settlements. It is often preferred due to its flexibility, efficiency, and potential to save resources, including time and money, compared to other methods such as litigation or arbitration.

The other options, while they have their places in the dispute resolution landscape, do not emphasize the same voluntary and cooperative spirit as negotiation. Random selection is not a viable method for addressing legal disputes, as it lacks fairness and transparency. Forced arbitration may be seen as less favorable by parties who prefer to maintain control over the outcome since it typically involves giving up the right to a trial. Public debate, although beneficial for raising awareness about certain issues, does not provide a structured or binding method for resolving legal disputes.