Which case involved the right to an attorney during police interrogations?

The case that established the right to an attorney during police interrogations is Miranda v. Arizona. This landmark Supreme Court decision, decided in 1966, addressed the rights of individuals in custody and the obligations of law enforcement during interrogation. The case arose from the interrogation of Ernesto Miranda, who was not informed of his right to counsel or the right against self-incrimination prior to being questioned by police.

As a result of this ruling, the Court determined that individuals must be informed of their rights, commonly known as "Miranda rights," before being subjected to interrogation. These rights include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The decision is crucial in protecting the Fifth Amendment rights of suspects, ensuring they are aware of their protections against coercive interrogation practices.

In contrast, the other cases mentioned focus on different aspects of law and do not directly address the right to an attorney during police interrogations. Roper v. Simmons dealt with the constitutionality of imposing the death penalty on minors, Tennessee v. Garner focused on the use of deadly force in law enforcement, and Atkins v. Virginia considered the execution of mentally disabled individuals. Each case plays a significant role in law and civil rights, but none specifically underpins the interrogation rights established in